What Are the Advantages of Small Air Cooled Chiller?
Air Cooled Chiller VS Water Cooled Chiller - ARANER
Many regions in the world are facing significant water scarcity. The numerous efforts in desalination and international water trade underscore the severity of this issue. According to the World Bank, 2 billion people live under conditions of absolute water scarcity—a figure that could reach 4.6 billion within the next 65 years. This water-energy nexus has been a continually discussed topic over recent years. Power plants, essential to many nations, consume large amounts of water, directly or indirectly. When conducting a feasibility study for a cooling plant, the decision of whether to use water becomes crucial. Based on these studies, the choice between water-cooled and air-cooled chillers is made.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Small Air Cooled Chiller.
What is a chiller?
This device removes heat from a load and transfers it to the environment using a refrigeration system. This heat transfer device is the preferable cooling machine in power plants and other large-scale facilities. It is simply a system consisting of ethylene + water or water reservoir and circulation components. The cooling fluid is circulated from the reservoir to the equipment undercooling. There are also air-cooled chillers, which disperse heat using fans. These are more recent and common in power plants. In this post, we will compare the two technologies, helping you to make an informed decision. ARANER would be happy to assist you in the decision-making process.
Water-Cooled Chiller
Water-cooled chiller systems come equipped with a cooling tower, making them more efficient than air-cooled chillers. Water-cooled chillers are more efficient because they condense based on the ambient wet-bulb temperature, which is generally lower than the ambient dry-bulb temperature. The lower a chiller condenses, the more efficient it is. This system consists of several components including:
- Cooling towers
- Condenser water pumps
- Make-up water pumps
- Chillers
- TES reservoirs
What are the benefits of a water-cooled chiller? Users may prefer these chillers for their smaller size compared to air-cooled chillers, higher efficiency, and longer lifespan. They are also ideal for indoor placement.
In The Evaporator
The role of the evaporator is to produce chilled water. The device releases the water at about 6°C (42.8°F) and pushes it throughout the facility with the help of a pump. A network of pipes passes the chilled water through every necessary section of the building. After exchanging coldness with room air, which blows across the Air Handling Units (AHUs) and fan coil units (FCUs), the water is now warmer at about 12°C (53.6°F). It returns to the evaporator where the refrigerant absorbs the unwanted heat and directs it to the condenser. The chilled water is cool once again and it can now continue to cool the facility. Note how this is called "chilled water" throughout no matter the temperature.
In The Condenser
A refrigerant brings unwanted heat from the evaporator and passes through the condenser. There is another loop connected to the condenser—the condenser water loop, which is between the cooling tower and the condenser. After entering the condenser at about 27°C (80.6°F), the water leaves at 32°C (89.6°F) and heads to the cooling tower. Note that at no time do the refrigerant and the condenser contact directly. Heat exchange is only through a pipe wall. The condenser water, carrying the unwanted heat, goes to the cooling tower for further heat rejection.
In The Cooling Towers
This is where the unwanted heat in a facility ends up. A large fan feeds the unit with air. The air meets with the incoming condenser water. From the direct contact, the condenser water loses heat to the air. The condenser water goes back to the condenser and the cycle continues. These open-topped devices come in many designs depending on various factors. Examples are cross-flow, counter-flow, natural draft, and mechanical draft. Stay with us for coverage of these designs in upcoming posts. This is a good way of resolving the cooling tower vs. chiller confusion. However, if you need more details about the water-cooled chiller components and operation, reach out to our team for assistance. Now, let's compare it to the air-cooled chiller discussed below.
Air-Cooled Chiller
Where aesthetics, environmental conditions, or water access restrictions exist, the air-cooled chiller may be applied. Both air-cooled and water-cooled chillers rely on an air stream for heat transfer. The difference is that water-cooled chillers or cooling towers use a humid air stream (ambient air + water spray), whereas air-cooled chillers use a current of ambient air. Generally, water-cooled chillers are cheaper and more efficient but have the disadvantage of high water consumption. ARANER has managed to combine modern manufacturing methods and advanced technology to achieve highly effective and efficient air-cooled chillers. As a result, the company's chiller plants are highly competitive with water chillers in various aspects. For example, these plants are impressive in terms of footprint, efficiency, and noise. Unfortunately, some people still believe that air-cooled chillers cannot offer good efficiencies. However, a closer look at the progressive increase in NPLV rating of air-cooled chillers over the years shows significant improvements. Many chiller plants in the Middle East and elsewhere have adopted ARANER's air-cooled designs and have expressed satisfaction. When used in part-load applications, these chillers are very reliable. In summary, here are the benefits of using air-cooled chillers:
- No cooling towers
- Better environmental stability—no water wastage
- Low maintenance costs
- Easier to operate and control—no tower freezing or tower bypass issues
- Avoidance of chemical costs
- Avoidance of water costs, especially in urban areas
- No water problems in case of disasters
Fig 1: Air-Cooled Chill Alongside Water Cooled (Traditional) Chiller
How do I choose between the two?
The cooling capacity is the main guideline for chiller selection. Equally important is balancing operating costs with capital costs. Some clients base their buying decision on initial costs. However, a value-based option considers both operational costs and initial costs. To determine the initial cost of each option, include costs for contractors and equipment. For a water-cooled chiller, remember to add the cost of the cooling tower. When it comes to life cycle costs, consider both purchase and operating costs. Evaluating each chiller this way helps determine its total cost. Water-cooled chillers may appear more valuable if one overlooks initial and water costs. However, a broader cost evaluation reveals a clearer picture.
Other alternatives: hybrid chillers
Hybrid chillers can operate as air-cooled chillers under certain conditions and as water-cooled chillers under others. They are an interesting alternative for areas with predominantly dry climates and low water availability or where water availability is inconsistent or unreliable.
Are you interested in learning more about Portable Air-Cooled Chiller? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!
It might interest you: Environmental Consideration of Chillers for District Cooling Plants
Water-cooled chiller and air-cooled chiller, the main advantages!
Energy cost remains a major consideration in any powered equipment. Energy-saving measures are being implemented everywhere. While the chiller has a direct impact on energy usage, there are other factors to consider. While the water-cooled chiller may be more energy-efficient, it faces stiff competition from air-cooled chillers in terms of installation cost, maintenance cost, number of equipment, and several other aspects. Most importantly, air-cooled chillers avoid water consumption, making them ideal in areas with water scarcity or where energy is cheap but water is costly. Have you made your choice already? Give us a call today for specialized and customized attention. If you enjoyed this post, you may want to learn about different heat rejection condensing technologies.
Air vs. Water Cooled Chillers
Which chiller type is best for data centers: air-cooled or water-cooled? There is no single answer. HVAC system designers need to ask many questions before recommending one type of chiller over another. The obvious equipment choice is sometimes overruled by unique project factors such as available square footage, backup power strategies, local regulations limiting power and water use, or the owner's sustainability priorities.
Ideally, data centers will consult with the HVAC company at the start of the design process to ensure the solution meets both short- and long-term objectives. If you are making decisions for a data center, understanding the pros and cons of each chiller type is essential.
Capacity: Packaged air-cooled chillers are typically available in sizes ranging from 7.5 to 500 tons (25 to 1,580 kW). Packaged water-cooled chillers are typically available from 10 to 4,000 tons (35 to 14,000 kW). In other words, water-cooled chillers can deliver higher cooling capacity with fewer units and a smaller footprint.
Maintenance: Air-cooled chillers eliminate the need for cooling towers. Water-cooled chillers require cooling towers, which have critical maintenance demands: water treatment, chiller condenser-tube cleaning, tower mechanical maintenance, and freeze protection. Systems that use open cooling towers must have a water treatment program to prevent contaminants like bacteria and algae. Cooling towers also evaporate water, requiring a large supply of make-up water to replace the evaporated volume.
Location: The pursuit of cheap power and lower taxes is changing the data center industry, leading to the establishment of huge facilities in remote locations far from users. In places where temperatures drop below freezing, air-cooled chillers are easier to operate as they eliminate the problems associated with cooling tower operation in severe winter conditions. Cooling towers may require special control sequences, basin heaters, or even an indoor sump for safe operation in freezing weather.
Energy efficiency: Water-cooled chillers are typically more energy-efficient than air-cooled chillers. The refrigerant condensing temperature in an air-cooled chiller depends on the ambient dry-bulb temperature, while in a water-cooled chiller, it depends on the condenser-water temperature, which in turn depends on the ambient wet-bulb temperature. The wet-bulb temperature is often significantly lower than the dry-bulb temperature, allowing the refrigerant condensing temperature (and pressure) in a water-cooled chiller to be lower than in an air-cooled chiller. This lower condensing temperature and pressure mean the compressor does less work and consumes less energy. However, this efficiency advantage may diminish during nighttime when the dry-bulb temperature drops faster than the wet-bulb temperature.
Delivery & Installation: Most air-cooled chillers are "packed systems." The condenser, compressor, and evaporator are designed and configured at the factory for optimal performance and reliability, reducing design and delivery time and simplifying installation. Water-cooled chillers have added complexities like condenser-water piping, pumps, cooling towers, and controls.
Longevity: With continued advancements in technology and the growth of data processing, data center infrastructure needs to support these advancements while delivering consistent performance. Generally, air-cooled chillers last 15 to 20 years, while water-cooled chillers last 20 to 30 years. This is partly because water-cooled chillers are typically installed indoors and operate at lower condenser fluid pressures, whereas air-cooled chillers operate outdoors at higher condenser pressures.
Water conservation: Water availability, cost, treatment requirements, and potential additional construction complexity all play a role in system selection. Since air-cooled chillers do not require water, they are often preferred in locations where there is a water shortage or where water is very expensive.
Water is one of the two major resources data centers consume. Combined, US data centers were responsible for the consumption of 626 billion liters of water in 2014, including both water consumed directly at data center sites and water used to generate the electricity that powered them that year. However, far more water is used to generate the electricity that powers data centers than to cool them, making chiller efficiency critical.
In summary, the advantages of air-cooled chillers include lower maintenance costs, a prepackaged system for easier design and installation, and better performance in freezing temperatures. The advantages of water-cooled chillers include greater energy efficiency, larger capacities, and longer equipment life. However, the best choice for a project depends on various factors. Data centers and system designers need to consider all factors to ensure the chosen chiller meets long-term objectives.
Contact us to discuss your requirements for About Chiller. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
- Previous: None
- Next: SludgePro™ XL 15 ft. Sludge Sampler
